<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A British Perspective On Mediation Strategies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chriswhitelaw.com.au/blog/mediation-skills/a-british-perspective-on-mediation-strategies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chriswhitelaw.com.au/blog/mediation-skills/a-british-perspective-on-mediation-strategies/</link>
	<description>Professional Dispute Resolution Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 05:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alasdair Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.chriswhitelaw.com.au/blog/mediation-skills/a-british-perspective-on-mediation-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Alasdair Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriswhitelaw.com.au/blog/?p=42#comment-29</guid>
		<description>It seems that David, from what I&#039;ve read in this post seeks to establish a forum in which narratives can flow in a fairly informal space, un-constrained by the restrictions the confined area that a legally formulated exchange would place upon proceedings. This flow of narrative offers the possibility of finding areas of communality, and therefore the possiblity of ageement. What makes some lawyer mediators distrustful or nervous of encouraging this sort of exchange? Could it be loss of control? If so what might be the outcome of this loss of control? How might this affect the outcome? What does anyone think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that David, from what I&#8217;ve read in this post seeks to establish a forum in which narratives can flow in a fairly informal space, un-constrained by the restrictions the confined area that a legally formulated exchange would place upon proceedings. This flow of narrative offers the possibility of finding areas of communality, and therefore the possiblity of ageement. What makes some lawyer mediators distrustful or nervous of encouraging this sort of exchange? Could it be loss of control? If so what might be the outcome of this loss of control? How might this affect the outcome? What does anyone think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

